University of Monastir, Tunisia
* Corresponding author
University of Monastir, Tunisia
University of Monastir, Tunisia
University of Monastir, Tunisia

Article Main Content

The prosthetic restoration of a unimaxillary edentulous arch is a complex treatment and a challenging clinical situation. This type of edentulous is more frequently encountered in the maxilla than in the mandible. It is opposed to a natural dentition, that can be the origin of aesthetic, occlusal and biological problems affecting the integration of the future prosthesis. Achieving harmonious occlusal plane and obtaining occlusal balance and aesthetic satisfaction of the patient are the principal objectives of the treatment. The practitioner must perform a reasoned analysis of the clinical case, detect the existing difficulties, and establish a strategy of adapted treatment. This article aim’s is to present, through two clinical cases, the particularities of this type of edentulism, and the therapeutic approach for the management of the aesthetic and functional difficulties.

References

  1. Ellinger CW, Rayson JH, Henderson D. Single complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1971; 26(1): 4-10.
     Google Scholar
  2. Foong KW, Patil PG. Fabrication of maxillary single complete denture in a patient with deranged mandibular occlusal plane: A case report. Saudi Dent J. 2019; 31(1): 148-54.
     Google Scholar
  3. Upadhyay SR, Singh SV, Bhalla G, Kumar L, Singh BP. Modified functionally generated path technique for single complete denture against non-modified natural dentition. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2012; 2(1): 67-71.
     Google Scholar
  4. Hue O, Berteretche MV. Prothèse complète: réalité clinique, solutions thérapeutiques. Paris: Quintessence International, 2004. French.
     Google Scholar
  5. Archien C, Louis JP, Helfer M, Mahiat Y, Minette C. La prothèse amovible complète unimaxillaire: un traitement complexe, de nombreux pièges à éviter. Stratégie Prothétique. 2006; 2(6): 85-96. French.
     Google Scholar
  6. Fajri L, Berrada S, Abdedine A. L'apport de l'exploration clinique dans le choix et l'orientation de la thérapeutique prothétique chez l'édenté complet. Rev Odont Stomat. 2008; 37(2): 91-107. French.
     Google Scholar
  7. Fajri L, Abdelkoui A, Abdedine A. Approche esthétique en prothèse amovible complète. Actual Odontostomatol2013; 266: 16-26. French.
     Google Scholar
  8. Fajri L, Berrada S, Merzouk N. L’articulateur dans l’étude pré-prothétique en Prothèse amovible partielle–Partie 2. Actual Odontostomatol. 2016; 276: 1-6. French.
     Google Scholar
  9. Driscoll CF, Masri RM. Single maxillary complete denture. Dent Clin North Am. 2004; 48(3): 567-83.
     Google Scholar
  10. Stansbury CB. Single denture construction against a nonmodified natural dentition. J Prosthet Dent. 1951; 1: 692-9.
     Google Scholar
  11. Vig RG. A modified chew-in and functional impression technique. J Prosthet Dent 1964; 14: 214-2.
     Google Scholar
  12. Rudd KD, Morrow RM. Occlusion and the single denture. J Prosthet Dent. 1973; 30: 4-10.
     Google Scholar
  13. Bhandari S. Outcome of single maxillary complete dentures opposing mandibular teeth: A need to introspect on the prosthodontic treatment protocol. J IndianProsthodont Soc. 2016; 16(1): 15-9.
     Google Scholar
  14. Dhiman RK, Chowdhury SR. Midline fractures in single maxillary complete acrylic vs flexible dentures. Med J Armed Forces India. 2009; 65(2): 141-5.
     Google Scholar
  15. Mahfoudhi AE, Tayari O, Mizouri A, Jaouadi J. Rehabilitation by single complete removable denture: a follow-up in a Tunisian clinical study. Dental News. 2021.
     Google Scholar