##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

3D printing has emerged as a promising technology in the field of dentistry which has become a topic of great interest. 3D printing along with CAD-CAM technology is being able to construct a three- dimensional object by adding material layer by layer. Recently, 3d printing technology have played a major role in pediatric dentistry from printing of individualized imprint trays, orthodontic models, maxillo-facial growth evaluation, fabrication of a variety of prosthetics, crowns, during fracture, surgical cases, navigating complex root canal treatments in pediatric patients. 3D-printed models could be used for educational purposes in training students and trainees. The treatment outcomes could be visualized with 3D printing technology which has made it a promising clinical tool. 3D printing technology has the capacity to revolutionize dentistry and in the near future, it is going to change the face of pediatric dentistry.

References

  1. Tiwari S, Kulkarni PD, Rathi SV, Abraham JM, Agrawal N, Kumar A. 3D printing: A silver lining in pediatric dentistry. Nveo-natural Volatiles &Essential Oils Journal. 2021; 18:11582-91.
     Google Scholar
  2. Dawood A, Marti BM, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A. 3D printing in dentistry. British Dental Journal. 2015; 11:219(11):521-9.
     Google Scholar
  3. Sikdar R, Bag A, Shirolkar S, Gayen K, Sarkar S, Roychowdhury S. 3D printing: Its application in pediatric dental practice. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences. 2022;6(2):2581-4893.
     Google Scholar
  4. Neha N, Somasundaram J, Maiti S, Jessy P. 3D printing-a new dimension in dentistry. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine. 2020;7(01): 1482-1497.
     Google Scholar
  5. Shaikh SS, Nahar P, Shaikh SY, Sayed AJ, Habibullah MA. Current perspectives of 3d printing in dental applications. Braz Dent Sci. 2021; 24(3): 1-9.
     Google Scholar
  6. Jain R, Supriya, Bindra S, Gupta K. Recent Trends of 3-D Printing in Dentistry – A review. Annals of Prosthodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 2016;2(4):101-104.
     Google Scholar
  7. Van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dental Materials. 2012;28(1):3-12. 6.
     Google Scholar
  8. Erickson DM, Chance D, Schmitt S, Mathts J. An opinion survey of reported benefits from the use of stereolithographic models. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1999 1;57(9):1040-3.
     Google Scholar
  9. Nayar S, Bhuminathan S, Bhat WM. Rapid prototyping and stereolithography in dentistry. Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences. 2015;7(Suppl 1):S216.
     Google Scholar
  10. Li B, Shen S, Jiang W, Li J, Jiang T, Xia JJ, Shen SG, Wang X. A new approach of splint-less orthognathic surgery using a personalized orthognathic surgical guide system: a preliminary study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2017 1;46(10):1298-305.
     Google Scholar
  11. Philippe B. Custom-made prefabricated titanium miniplates in Le Fort I osteotomies: principles, procedure and clinical insights. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2013;42(8):1001-1006.
     Google Scholar
  12. Nayar S, Bhuminathan S, Bhat WM. Rapid prototyping and stereolithography in dentistry. Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences. 2015;7(Suppl 1):S216.
     Google Scholar
  13. Vandekar M, Fadia D, Vaid NR, Doshi V. Rapid prototyping as an adjunct for auto transplantation of impacted teeth in the esthetic zone. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics: JCO. 2015;49(11):711-5.
     Google Scholar
  14. Xia J, Li Y, Cai D, Shi X, Zhao S, Jiang Q, Yang X. Direct resin composite restoration of maxillary central incisors using a 3D-printed template: two clinical cases. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18:1-8.
     Google Scholar
  15. Ucar Y, Aysan Meric I, Ekren O. Layered manufacturing of dental ceramics: fracture mechanics, microstructure, and elemental composition of lithography‐sintered ceramic. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2019;28(1):e310-8.
     Google Scholar
  16. Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14(1):1-7.
     Google Scholar
  17. Unkovskiy A, Spintzyk S, Brom J, Huettig F, Keutel C. Direct 3D printing of silicone facial prostheses: A preliminary experience in digital workflow. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2018 1;120(2):303-8.
     Google Scholar
  18. Bhaggyashri A Pawar. Maintenance of space by innovative three-dimensional-printed band and loop space maintainer. JISPPD. 2019;37(2);201-205.
     Google Scholar
  19. Salmi M, Paloheimo KS, Tuomi J, Ingman T, Mäkitie A. A digital process for additive manufacturing of occlusal splints: a clinical pilot study. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 2013(6);10(84):20130203.
     Google Scholar
  20. Al Mortadi N, Eggbeer D, Lewis J, Williams RJ. CAD/CAM/AM applications in the manufacture of dental appliances. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2012 1;142(5):727-33.
     Google Scholar
  21. Van Der Meer WJ, Vissink A, Ng YL, Gulabivala K. 3D Computer aided treatment planning in endodontics. Journal of dentistry. 2016;45:67-72.
     Google Scholar
  22. Byun C, Kim C, Cho S, Baek SH, Kim G, Kim SG, Kim SY. Endodontic treatment of an anomalous anterior tooth with the aid of a 3-dimensional printed physical tooth model. Journal of Endodontics. 2015 1;41(6):961-5.
     Google Scholar
  23. Xu HH, Wang P, Wang L, Bao C, Chen Q, Weir MD, Chow LC, Zhao L, Zhou X, Reynolds MA. Calcium phosphate cements for bone engineering and their biological properties. Bone Research. 2017 20;5(1):1-9.
     Google Scholar
  24. Larsson L, Decker AM, Nibali L, Pilipchuk SP, Berglundh T, Giannobile WV. Regenerative medicine for periodontal and peri-implant diseases. Journal of Dental Research. 2016 ;95(3):255-66.
     Google Scholar
  25. Werz SM, Zeichner SJ, Berg BI, Zeilhofer HF, Thieringer F. 3D printed surgical simulation models as educational tool by maxillofacial surgeons. European Journal of Dental Education. 2018 ;22(3):e500-5.
     Google Scholar
  26. Lambrecht JT and Brix F. “Individual skull model fabrication for craniofacial surgery”. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal.1990; 27: 382-385.
     Google Scholar
  27. Kröger E, Dekiff M, Dirksen D. 3D printed simulation models based on real patient situations for hands‐on practice. European Journal of Dental Education. 2017;21(4):e119-25.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.