Review Article

Techniques and Graft Materials Used in Maxillary Sinus Lift Procedure for Dental Implant Placement

Noor Mohammed Al-Noori
Mustansiriyah University, Iraq
* Corresponding author
Fatima Ali Makawi
Mustansiriyah University, Iraq
DOI icon 10.24018/ejdent.2022.3.4.198

Read Counter
287

Downloads
154

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2022-06-01
Published 2022-08-31

Read counter = 287 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

Posterior quadrant of the maxilla consider as special challenges for use of implant active prostheses to restore dental function. Placement of Implant in the posterior part of maxilla influence hesitation due to the lack of sufficient alveolar bone height. This occurs due to the proximity of alveolar crest to the maxillary sinus because of sinus pneumatization, along with resorption of bone of the alveolar ridge secondary to tooth extraction, pathological lesion or trauma. Sinus lifting to augment atrophic maxillary posterior area to create space for implantation has been progressively widespread in latest years. In literatures 2 approaches have been designated for sinus lifting: the direct approach called also lateral approach and the indirect approach called also crestal approach.

Keywords: Grafting material, lifting technique, sinus anatomy, sinus lifting

References

  1. Bathla SC, Fry RR, Majumdar K. Maxillary sinus augmentation. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2018; 22: 468–473.
     Google Scholar
  2. Stelzle F, Benner KU. Evaluation of different methods of indirect sinus floor elevation for elevation heights of 10 mm: An experimental ex vivo study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011; 13: 124-133.
     Google Scholar
  3. Sani E, Veltri M, Cagidiaco MC, Balleri P, Ferrari M. Sinus membrane elevation in combination with placement of blasted implants: A 3 year case report of sinus augmentation without grafting material. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 37: 966-969.
     Google Scholar
  4. Woo I, Le BT. Maxillary sinus floor elevation: review of anatomy and two techniques, Implant Dent. 2004; 13: 28–32.
     Google Scholar
  5. Van den Bergh JP, ten Bruggenkate CM, Disch FJ, Tuinzing DB. Anatomical aspects of sinus floor elevations, Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000; 11: 256–265.
     Google Scholar
  6. Sharan A, Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: a radiographic study, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23: 48–56.
     Google Scholar
  7. Zijderveld SA, van den Bergh JP, Schulten EA, ten Bruggenkate CM. Anatomical and surgical findings and complications in 100 consecutive maxillary sinus floor elevation procedures, J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 66: 1426–1438.
     Google Scholar
  8. Bell GW, Joshi BB, Macleod RI. Maxillary sinus disease: diagnosis and treatment, Br Dent J. 2011; 210: 113–118, 17.
     Google Scholar
  9. Standring S. Gray's anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 41st ed. London: Elsevier Health Sciences. 2015.
     Google Scholar
  10. Jeong KI, Kim SG, Oh JS, You JS. Implants displaced into the maxillary sinus: a systematic review. Implant Dent. 2016; 25: 547–551.
     Google Scholar
  11. Underwood AS. An inquiry into the anatomy and pathology of the maxillary sinus, J Anat Physiol. 1910; 44(Pt 4): 354–369.
     Google Scholar
  12. Wen SC, Chan HL, Wang HL. Classification and management of antral septa for maxillary sinus augmentation, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013; 33: 509–517.
     Google Scholar
  13. Kim JH, Kim UC, Lee JY, Kim HC, Kim SN. A clinical & radiologic study of bone remodeling effects using rhBMP-2 for maxillary sinus graft. J Dent Implant Res. 2016; 35: 46–52.
     Google Scholar
  14. Wen SC, Lin YH, Yang YC, Wang HL. The influence of sinus membrane thickness upon membrane perforation during transcrestal sinus lift procedure, Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26(10): 1158–1164.
     Google Scholar
  15. Yilmaz HG, Tozum TF. Are gingival phenotype, residual ridge height, and membrane thickness critical for the perforation of maxillary sinus? J Periodontol. 2012; 83: 420–425.
     Google Scholar
  16. Flanagan D. Arterial supply of maxillary sinus and potential for bleeding complication during lateral approach sinus elevation. Implant Dent. 2005; 14: 336–338.
     Google Scholar
  17. Bornstein MM, Scarfe WC, Vaughn VM, Jacobs R. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: a systematic review focusing on guidelines, indications, and radiation dose risks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29(Suppl): 55–77.
     Google Scholar
  18. Malina-Altzinger J, Damerau G, Grätz KW, Stadlinger PD. Evaluation of the maxillary sinus in panoramic radiography: a comparative study. Int J Implant Dent. 2015; 1: 17.
     Google Scholar
  19. Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW, Staff RT, Bainton R. Assessment of the sinus lift operation by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999; 37: 285–289.
     Google Scholar
  20. Gray CF, Staff RT, Redpath TW, Needham G, Renny NM. Assessment of maxillary sinus volume for the sinus lift operation by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000; 29: 154–158.
     Google Scholar
  21. Senel FC, Duran S, Icten O, Izbudak I, Cizmeci F. Assessment of the sinus lift operation by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 44: 511–514.
     Google Scholar
  22. Lim D, Parumo R, Chai MB, Shanmuganathan J. Transnasal endoscopy removal of dislodged dental implant: a case report. J Oral Implantol. 2017; 43: 228–231.
     Google Scholar
  23. Jang HY, Kim HC, Lee SC, Lee JY. Choice of graft material in relation to maxillary sinus width in internal sinus floor augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 68: 1859–1868.
     Google Scholar
  24. Reiser GM, Rabinovitz Z, Bruno J, Damoulis PD, Griffin TJ. Evaluation of maxillary sinus membrane response following elevation with the crestal osteotome technique in human cadavers. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001; 16(6): 833-40.
     Google Scholar
  25. Cavicchia F, Bravi F, Petrelli G. Localized augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor through a coronal approach for the placement of implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001; 21(5): 475-85.
     Google Scholar
  26. Nkenke E, Stelzle F. Clinical outcomes of sinus floor augmentation for implant placement using autogenous bone or bone substitutes: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002; 20: 124-33.
     Google Scholar
  27. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg. 1980; 38(8): 613-6.
     Google Scholar
  28. Caudry S, Landzberg M. Lateral window sinus elevation technique: managing challenges and complications. J Can Dent Assoc. 2013; 79: d101.
     Google Scholar
  29. Zheng J, Zhang S, Lu E, Yang C, Zhang W, Zhao J. Endoscopic lift of the maxillary sinus floor in Beagles. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 52: 845–849.
     Google Scholar
  30. Piattelli M, Favero GA, Scarano A, Orsini G, Piattelli A. Bone reactions to anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) used in sinus augmentation procedures: a histologic long-term report of 20 cases in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999; 14(6): 835-40.
     Google Scholar
  31. Hallman M, Lundgren S, Sennerby L. Histologic analysis of clinical biopsies taken 6 months and 3 years after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with 80% bovine hydroxyapatite and 20% autogenous bone mixed with fibrin glue. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2001; 3: 87 96.
     Google Scholar
  32. Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE, Dayan D. Nonceramic hydroxyapatite bone derivative in sinus augmentation procedures: clinical and histomorphometric observations in 10 consecutive cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003; 23: 381–389.
     Google Scholar
  33. Cochran DL, Schenk R, Buser D, Wozney JM, Jones AA. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 stimulation of bone formation around endosseous dental implants. Journal of Periodontology. 1999; 70: 139-150.
     Google Scholar
  34. Simunek A, Kopecka D, Cierny M. The use of oxidized regenerated cellulose (Surgicel®) in closing Schneiderian membrane tears during the sinus lift procedure. West Indian Medical Journal. 2005; 54: 398-399.
     Google Scholar
  35. Gray CF, Redpath TW, Bainton R, Smith FW. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of a sinus lift operation using reoxidised cellulose (Surgicel) as graft material. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:526–530.
     Google Scholar
  36. Hernández-Alfaro F, Torradeflot MM, Marti C. Prevalence and management of Schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus-lift procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19: 91–98.
     Google Scholar